What Does the Bible Say About Getting Blood Transfusions?

You are here

What Does the Bible Say About Getting Blood Transfusions?

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!

Sign In | Sign Up

×
Downloads
MP3 Audio (4.58 MB)

Downloads

What Does the Bible Say About Getting Blood Transfusions?

MP3 Audio (4.58 MB)
×

Sometimes it’s been interpreted that the biblical law against eating blood means that people also shouldn’t have blood transfusions. A look at the verses about blood in the Bible shows that this wasn’t the intent of the law. The command was a prohibition against customs that pagan nations around Israel were using in their worship of idols and false gods. This type of pagan worship sometimes involved drinking the blood of animals in the belief that the worshiper would receive strength through the blood.

Notice this paragraph from Commentary on the Whole Bible by Jamieson, Fausset and Brown on Leviticus 17:10: “[I will even set my face against that soul that eateth blood.] The face of God is often used in Scripture to denote His anger <Psalms 34:16; Revelation 6:16; Ezekiel 38:18>; and the manner in which God’s face would be set against such an offender was, that if the crime were public and known, he was condemned to death; if it were secret, vengeance would overtake him (see the note at <Genesis 9:4>). But the practice against which the law is here pointed was an idolatrous rite. The Zabians, or worshippers of the heavenly host, were accustomed, in sacrificing animals, to pour out the blood, and eat a part of the flesh at the place where the blood was poured out, and sometimes the blood itself, believing that by means of it friendship, brotherhood, and familiarity were contracted between the worshippers and the deities. They, moreover, supposed that the blood was very beneficial in obtaining for them a vision of the demon during their sleep, and a revelation of future events. The prohibition against eating blood, viewed in the light of this historic commentary, and unconnected with the special terms in which it is expressed, seems to have been leveled against idolatrous practices, as is still further evident from <Ezekiel 33:25-26; 1 Corinthians 10:20-21>.”

So when the Bible does talk about blood, it doesn’t have anything to do with the modern practice of blood transfusions.

Since there’s no dogmatic statement on a modern medical procedure like a blood transfusion in the Bible, it’s up to the individual to make decisions about health care and treatment programs. It’s a good, godly principle for people to take reasonable responsibility for their health and well-being. Any conventional or alternative medical practices they might choose to use are matters of individual conscience and preference. Any serious health decisions should be made with prayer and fasting as we look to God as our healer, along with anointing for the sick in faith (James 5:14-15).

You might also be interested in...

Comments

  • Elna

    I believe that blood transfusion is eating or drinking blood. If the hospital gives oral medication, and that same medication in liquid form is given by transfusion, it is one and the same thing. It does tge same thing when it enters the body. By the way, I am not a Jehovah's witness. I just don't like it when the scripture is taken out of context.

  • JCReigns

    Brother the numerous times abstaining from blood is mentioned in the now it talks about drinking it and things offered into idols.Why would leveticus mean any different.thousands of lived ones are dying prematurely because of the misinterpation the jehovas witness are forcing and it is also contradicting their other belief that we should take care of our bodies

  • V.M.

    I do not understand how these scriptures were taken out of context. Several times God specifies that blood should not be *eaten* because, like this article stated, drinking blood was a ritual of many pagan religions at the time and still is today. Oral medication and intravenous medication are not the same just because both affect the patient or person at some point nor does it necessarily affect the body the same way; to say so is a conflation. I really think the two reasons why God wanted his people to abstain is for the symbolic, spiritual reason and also the health reason, that any pathogens a living organism may harbor will be found in the blood, a well-known fact in the medical world today. However, I'm very curious as to what you meant by the scripture being taken out of context so if there is any clarification or additional information that you'd like to add, please do. I hope you understand that this wasn't to slight you in any way :)

  • Join the conversation!

    Log in or register to post comments