Search form

Search

How Old Is the Earth?

You are here

UCG.org / Vertical Thought / How Old Is the Earth?

How Old Is the Earth?

by Paul Luecke 9 comments Estimated reading time: 8 minutes
Add to my study list

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!

Sign In | Sign Up

×
How Old Is the Earth? UCG.org
How Old Is the Earth?

How old is the earth? Some believe that God created the universe with a "Big Bang" followed by an evolutionary process over billions of years that eventually produced stars, planets and all life-forms—in the latter case, simpler organisms gradually giving rise to more complex ones. Others (like the United Church of God) believe that God created everything long ago, well before the time of man, but without using a macroevolutionary process in the development of life and its variety. People who believe either of these explanations are often lumped together as "old-earth creationists."

Another group believes that God created the universe and all life in six days about 6,000 years ago. Proponents of this explanation are sometimes called "young-earth creationists."

Young-earth creationists rightfully point out that if God could bring everything into existence in the blink of an eye, He didn't need an evolutionary process over billions of years to produce stars, planets and life. Yet as old-earth creationists point out, there are numerous scientific indications that the earth is older than 6,000 years, and a careful reading of the biblical account does not require us to fight against that evidence.

Evolutionists often ridicule the stance of young-earth creationists. They argue that you can either believe the scientific evidence or hold onto the illusion that God created everything 6,000 years ago.

Does the Bible give any indications about the amount of time that may have passed between God's creation of the universe and His creation of mankind?

Before the six days of creation

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" (Genesis 1:1, emphasis added throughout). "Heavens" refers to the galaxies, planets and stars, including our sun. We aren't given a date when this occurred. This verse does not restrict the time frame to either 6,000 or billions of years ago.

Verse 2 then says, "The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep." As with most of the Old Testament, this verse was originally written in Hebrew. And the Hebrew word translated "was" here can have the sense of became. The same word is used in Genesis 3:20, where we read that Eve "became the mother of all the living" (New American Bible).

Next let's consider the phrase "without form." The Hebrew word for this phrase is tohu, which means formless, confusion, empty, wasteland, a place of chaos. The word "void" is the Hebrew word bohu, which means emptiness, void, waste or ruin.

Dr. Arthur Custance, in his book Without Form and Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis 1:2, states, "I am persuaded that there is, on the basis of the evidence, far more reason to translate Genesis 1:2 as 'But the earth had become a ruin and a desolation, etc.' than there is for any of the conventional translations in our modern versions" (p. 7).

Since Genesis 1:2 can either mean that the earth was or that it became "without form, and void," what do additional scriptures indicate?

Isaiah 45:18 says of the earth that God "did not create it in vain [tohu]," but instead "formed it to be inhabited." The Hebrew word for "vain" is the same word used in Genesis 1:2. If God did not create the earth (originally) as a formless wasteland, then something happened that caused it to become that way, sometime after God created it. We'll address what likely caused this state of confusion in a moment.

Genesis 1:2 continues, "And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters." Psalm 104 also describes some of God's creative works. Verse 30 says, "You send forth Your Spirit, they are created; and You renew the face of the earth." The word translated "renew" means to rebuild, renew or repair. This harmonizes with the understanding that the first two verses of Genesis show an initial creation of the heavens and the earth that was not in vain (tohu), followed by a catastrophic event that left the earth in ruins, followed by God renewing the earth by His Spirit.

Verse 3, then, actually begins the record of God's creative work of renewing the earth and preparing it for His new creative masterpiece—human beings!

Now, how long before this destruction and renewal was the earth itself created? A day before? A year before? A million years or more before? The account simply does not say when the earth itself was created. What it says is that during the six-day period described in the verses that follow, God brought the planet into an orderly arrangement that would support life as we know it.

Angels and the biblical record

The creation of angels and the record of their activity best harmonizes with a creation that existed prior to the seven days of re-creation or renewing the earth for human beings.

In Job 38:4-7 God asks Job, "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth...when the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?"

The terms "morning stars" and "sons of God" both refer to angels. They all shouted for joy when God first created the earth. All the angels—including Lucifer, who later became Satan—were in agreement with God and were ecstatic about what He had just made. When the earth was first created, Lucifer was not yet corrupted with iniquity. It certainly seems that considerable time must have passed between the creation of the earth, when Lucifer was in agreement with God, and his later appearance as the evil deceiver to Adam and Eve in Genesis 3.

We find more details in Isaiah 14:12, where God says: "How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground." Jesus Christ, who lived in glory with the Father from eternity past before becoming human, said that He saw Lucifer fall from heaven (Luke 10:18).

Isaiah 14:13-14 explains some of Satan's motivation: "For you have said in your heart: 'I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God; I will also sit on the mount of the congregation on the farthest sides of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds, I will be like the Most High.'"

In Ezekiel 28:14-16 God sheds more light on the story: "You were the anointed cherub who covers; I established you; you were on the holy mountain of God; you walked back and forth in the midst of fiery stones. You were perfect in your ways from the day you were created, till iniquity was found in you. By the abundance of your trading you became filled with violence within, and you sinned; therefore I cast you as a profane thing out of the mountain of God."

Something caused the beautiful earth—which all the angels were thrilled to see—to become a wasteland, choked with debris and incapable of supporting life. It seems likely that the rebellion of Lucifer led to this devastation.

Notice also Jude 6: "And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day." These angels abandoned the domain God gave them, the earth, either by leaving it (perhaps in the attempt to take over God's throne) or abandoning their responsibility to properly maintain it.

Summary of the scenario

So we don't know how long ago God originally created the heavens and the earth, but the biblical account reveals:

• God first created the angels at an unspecified time in the past.

• He then created the earth and material universe—including the sun and other stars. At this time all the angels were still righteous and rejoiced.

• The angels were given a domain, which included the earth.

• The angels may then have spent hundreds, thousands, millions or billions of years active in this domain, which likely included plant and animal life on the earth. There is nothing in the Bible to prohibit the existence of life-forms such as the dinosaurs in this pre-Adamic world.

• Lucifer eventually deviated from God's righteous way. He ultimately convinced one third of the angels to follow him in rebelling against God (Revelation 12:4).

• These angels became dissatisfied with their domain. Satan plotted to ascend into heaven and dethrone God.

• God cast Satan and the sinful angels down to the earth to await judgment. We find Satan already here to turn Adam and Eve against God soon after they were created.

• The result of Satan's rebellion likely resulted in the devastation (whether suddenly or over a long period of time) of the beautiful earth God originally created.

• God renewed the surface of the earth to support life and be suitable for His new creation—human beings!

The Bible actually shows an existing creation—earth and universe—preceding the six-day account of Genesis 1:3-31. Based on this record of angelic activity before the preparation of the earth for humankind, we conclude that the earth is much older than 6,000 years. For additional study, we recommend our free booklet Creation or Evolution: Does It Really Matter What You Believe? VT

young-earth creationists Proofs of the Bible Bible History Background of the Bible The Bible God in Science Creation Science

You might also be interested in...

Comments

  • RayStapp
    Raymond F Stapp

    One scripture that has been omitted from this discussion is Ex 20:11 " 11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it." KJV It seems to me that this verse should be considered and seems to favor a young earth.

  • Peter John Hutchison
    Peter Hutchison

    Mr Luecke wrote "There is nothing in the Bible to prohibit the existence of life-forms such as the dinosaurs in this pre-Adamic world." I am afraid that is not so. On day 2 of the creation week God created space. Gen 1:6  And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 
    Gen 1:7  And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 
    On day 4 we see how big this space is, it is the volume of our universe. Gen 1:14  And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years. Gen 1:16  And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. 
    So what we have is that the space of our universe was created on day 2. Hence there was no space around the earth on day1. No space equals no sun or moon in place and no atmosphere which in turn means no life.
    A careful reading of the six creation days shows a definite chronological history of the creation.

  • Terry Gilkes
    Terry Gilkes

    "We conclude that the earth is much older than 6,000 years" Not according to Mr Armstroung.
    What's going on here?

  • Ivan Veller
    Ivan Veller

    Dear Mr. Gilkes,

    My friend, I would submit that this article accords with our longstanding teaching. For instance, the Ambassador College booklet "Our Awesome Universe," in the article "How Old is the Universe?" (p. 27), states: "The 6,000-year age for the earth often erroneously associated with Genesis 1 has been arrived at because of a fundamental misinterpretation of the biblical account. When properly understood, the Bible leaves a great degree of latitude for both the age of the earth and the universe."

  • Terry Gilkes
    Terry Gilkes

    A simple fact of nuclear physics.
    Uranium 3.28 by the process of radioactivity (Atomic deterioration of the molecule lattice” loses its Atoms and reduces Atomic weight down to Molar mass of Ra = 226 g/ mol thus transmuting into radium.
    Radium by the same process of radioactivity loses its Atoms resulting into its base metal Lead.
    The whole process of this natural occurrence takes 6000 years from uranium 3.28 to Plumbum.
    If the Earth was any older than 6000 years then no radioactive substance would be on earth.
    It is by the process kenned as the moiety life we have what little radioactive elements remaining.
    quod erat demonstrandum.

  • Steven Britt
    Steven Britt

    Hi Terry - I think you mean uranium 238, the most common radioactive isotope of uranium. What you've said does not appear to be true. The half-life of uranium 238 is over 4 billion years. This means that if you start out with 2 pounds of uranium 238, then in 4 billion years you will have 1 pound of uranium 238 and 1 pound of thorium 234.

  • Ivan Veller
    Ivan Veller

    But what about Bismuth-209's half-life of 19 quintillion years (19,000,000,000,000,000,000 years)?

  • twocents
    twocents

    Historical science is evidence but not proof. Both YECs and OECs use historical scientific evidence to support their respective theories. Debating the Bible's stance is more sound by far, since only Elohim existed when all was initially created, however long ago it might have been. There are numerous "could have," "might have," "perhaps," "seems like," etc. in UCG articles on this subject. In some congregations this has become or is becoming a divisive issue, with OYCs (who support, rightly so, perhaps, the UCG position) speaking of their YEC brethren as teaching false doctrine, which is the equivalent of teaching heresy. Is the YEC position heresy? If so, then adherents must be warned to avoid such teachings and, unhappily, disfellowshiped if they persist. If not heresy, then, I believe, the UCG responsibility before Jesus Christ, is to state clearly and unambiguously its stance on whether or not YEC-OEC discussions are allowable between brethren in Christian love and esteem, realizing that God's Church has made errors in the past, is not infallible in the present nor in the future, pending Christ's return. Is this a matter of iron-clad fundamental doctrine or rather of grace?

  • Eric V. Snow
    Eric Snow

    It's worth some open-minded consideration of the case the young earth creationists make for an earth that's younger than c. 4.5 billion years. There are many measures of physical change that can make the same uniformitarian assumptions that the radiactive decay measures, yet they result in much shorter ages for the earth. An old, but classic list of these can be found in John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris' "The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications" (1961), pp. 379-391. For example, the gradual deposition of salt in the ocean indicates the earth is between 50 million and 90 million years old, the emergence of juvenile water from volcanos for filling the oceans around 315 to 400 million years old, atmospheric helium at 26 million years, and the general absence of meteoric dust in the earth's crust. Much more update arguments along this line could be produced. Although I believe in the "gap theory," that thousands or millions of years could have happened between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, it could be a compromise date should be considered: Could the earth be (say) 100,000 years old? That is, the strict young earth creationists are wrong to say the earth is roughly 10,000 years old, but the standard evolutionary date of 4.5 billion years is also wrong. The uniformation assumptions have to be questioned themselves when there's plenty of evidence for catastrophism in the earth's physical geological record: We shouldn't assume that "the present is the key to the past," and then blindly extrapolate backwards the current rates of various geological processes. We know from Scripture that the great flood, Satan's rebellion, as well as the earth's being cursed by God when Adam and Eve were exiled from the Garden of Eden make such assumptions absurd. So in conclusions, we should open-mindedly read what the young earth creationists say, and consider using some of their arguments for a young earth to attack the theory of evolution's dependence on an old earth. For after all, if the earth is (say) only 1 million or 50 million years old according to this or that dating method, the theory of evolution is totally unstainable intellectually.

    • Join the conversation!

    Log in or register to post comments